We have five factors of production (FP) that in pages 7, 8 and 9 of our book are very well defined; they are: labour, capital, entrepreneurs, natural resources and information resources.
PCC value chain is a big chain; many processes are part of this chain, and without any doubt, we could identify the intensive use for each one of the five factors of production on these processes.
But if we analyse these PCC value chain sub-processes with one more level of detail, we could divide this big chain in processes with similar intensity in the use of the five FP. For example, Peel and Slice operations are very similar in the demand of resources; in fact, for operational characteristics, we could find these two processes in the same building and in a very near location. In addition, they share more than FP. Otherwise, Producers and Apply flavour processes are significantly different in the use of FP; they require different intensity of land, water, labour resources. It is clear at this point that it will be beneficial to divide the PCC value chain to better identify the FP in the process chain.
The first division that we could analyse, taking few assumptions, is based on the physical operation for each part of the chain:
1. AFP1: Producers: it represents an industry in itself inside PCC value chain.
2. AFP2: Transport to plant site, Distribution to retailers: idem
3. AFP3: Purchasing warehouse storing potatoes: idem
4. AFP4: Wash, peel, slide, fry, apply flavour and package potatoes: they are contents in the same factory/building (process characteristics demand that)
5. AFP5: Retailers
A brief analysis of the FP use that we could identify shows:
AFP1 |
Labour |
Intensive, big demand, not many skills. |
|
Capital |
Big demand to start, medium to operate |
|
Entrepreneurs |
Narrow opportunities and risks involved in a regulated market |
|
Natural resources |
Huge demand |
|
Information resources |
Low demand |
AFP2 |
Labour |
Intensive, medium level of many skills. |
|
Capital |
Big demand to start and operate |
|
Entrepreneurs |
Medium opportunities assuming risks for this opportunities |
|
Natural resources |
Low demand |
|
Information resources |
Low/medium demand |
AFP3 |
Labour |
Non-intensive, medium demand, not many skills. |
|
Capital |
Big demand to start, low to operate |
|
Entrepreneurs |
Few opportunities to assume important risks |
|
Natural resources |
Low/Medium demand |
|
Information resources |
Low demand |
AFP4 |
Labour |
Intensive, big demand, many skills. |
|
Capital |
Big demand to start and operate |
|
Entrepreneurs |
Important opportunities to assume risks with the goal to improve the business |
|
Natural resources |
High demand |
|
Information resources |
High demand |
AFP5 |
Labour |
Intensive, big demand, medium level of many skills. |
|
Capital |
Big demand to start, medium to operate |
|
Entrepreneurs |
Medium opportunities to assume important risks with the goal of to improve the business |
|
Natural resources |
Low/Medium demand |
|
Information resources |
High demand |
This break down shows the relative importance in the FP requirement of the different sub-processes. In addition, if we add the five subdivisions we get the complete value chain; in this case the complete value chain has an intensive use of the five FP and the PCC value chain as the maximum between the sub-processes. The following table summarize this where * = low; ** = medium and *** = high level.
Intensity |
AFP1 |
AFP2 |
AFP3 |
AFP4 |
AFP5 |
PCC value chain |
Labour |
*** |
*** |
** |
*** |
*** |
*** |
Capital |
*** |
*** |
*** |
*** |
*** |
*** |
Entrepreneurs |
* |
** |
* |
*** |
** |
*** |
Natural resources |
*** |
* |
** |
*** |
** |
*** |
Information resources |
* |
** |
** |
*** |
*** |
*** |
All FP are essential for the manufacture of potato chips if essential means basic or indispensable. Today, without only one FP, PCC could not operate. In other hand, some sub-process could operate without some FP; for example, with lose of some efficiency and productivity, AFP1 could operate without Information resources.
I think it is important to stress here that the FP do not operate in a parallel scheme where we could substitute one of them in case of failure, problems or simple desire. Also, it is impossible to expand the boundary of each factor of production trying to cover the lack of other. We could support the idea of lower/higher or slower/faster impact of each FP in PCC value chain, but the lack of one of them, late or soon will take out of the market to PCC (also Entrepreneurs because the high competitiveness of the market where PCC operates).
Each factor has different impact in the PCC business, but all of them are essential for the PCC production. Natural resources and labour have a basic and very easy understanding of their necessity. Capital is a key factor in the start of the business and an important factor for the day a day operation. Entrepreneurs looks with low requirement for a classic industry as potato chips, but essential in a very competitive market such this, where innovation are important. Finally, Information resource also is an important factor of production. PCC value chain could produce without information resource in its value chain, but it will last few days in the competitive market. Similar analysis could be developed for each sub-division based on the above tables.
19/05/11